Defending Government

I recently heard a commentary about the struggle between Republicans and Democrats on Vermont Public Radio that seemed counter intuitive, if not totally mistaken.

In “Battle of the Titans”,  Bill Schubart argues that the battle in Washington:

is not over a balanced budget. It is not between the rich and the poor. It’s not between business and consumers. It’s not about the environment. It’s not about Sara Palin’s intellect or the entropic Tea Party.

What is it really about?  It is a “deadly serious battle of philosophies” pitting an “experienced dinosaur with clear objectives and a well conceived strategy for winning” against, you guessed it, “a disorganized dinosaur with good intentions and no strategy”, aka, Democrats.

In light of recent Republican missteps around Medicare (last year’s defenders of Medicare now want to eliminate the program) I would quarrel with this assessment. What intrigues me is his statement:

If Democrats continue to measure projected outcomes of this battle by unwanted pregnancies, high school dropouts, starving seniors, uncared-for-vets, or the medically uninsured, they will lose this fight.

Why should talk about the negative consequences of Republican policies be ineffective, or worse, be counterproductive?  Could such talk increase support for Republican policies?

I do not believe that describing the financial consequences on senior citizens of transforming Medicare into a voucher program is a bad strategy. In fact, Republicans facing pressure from voters have back pedaled on the voucher plan.  Articulating the consequences of proposed policies in the form of stories told by “real people” makes sense, but is it enough?

Is the alternative a philosophical debate about the role of government?  My view is that today more than ever we need a debate about the role of government,  a collective government 101 course that fully confronts the chasm separating the two parties.  As an opposition party Republicans have embraced not  “limited government” but “no government”.

Implicit in their belief system  is that business, regulated only by the constraints of a free market, can manage any complex socio-economic system better than government.

I am not optimistic that we can have a productive debate over fundamentals.  Such as debate is likely to be too abstract and demanding for voters.  What is the incentive  to engage in this debate?  I do not have an answer.

But, there might be a third possibility, perhaps not as abstract, linked to practical outcomes of interest to voters.  Again, Bill Schubart:

Personally, I believe in the possibility of good government. One that is wholly transparent and accountable to its citizens. If we focused more on framing the elements of good government and less on circling one another and trumpeting our philosophical differences we might make progress.

Transparency, accountability, effectiveness, and efficiency are arguably elements of “good government”.  On the other hand, Republican-Libertarians are not interested in “good” government.  Maybe Schubart is right on target.  A philosophical debate about the role of government is far less useful than making “good” government work.

via Commentary Series: Schubart: Battle Of The Titans.

This entry was posted in Opening Minds, Political Talk and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Defending Government

  1. Fathead says:

    Dinosaurs? A Tyrannosaurus and an Allosaurus?

    Yes, I shut my eyes and did it for England, as it were. I voted for a Democratic Obama not because I believed in the Obama-hype, but because it seemed the lesser of two evils.

    What is clearly going on, unbeknownst to the brainwashed populace, is class warfare. The rich are beating the stuffing out of everyone else. All the available data trends this way. The Gilded Age robber barons at least had some opposition.

    Most of our elected representatives are mouthing platitudes while doing all they can to facilitate the transfer of wealth to the rich because they mostly belong to that class, or aspire to it, and because they need the money that comes from serving those who pay to keep them in office.

    The media, pimping for their rich owners (Rupert Murdoch, Michael Bloomberg et al), have convinced the voters that greed is laudable and government is evil (except when their benefits are affected, of course).

    Quibbling about our so-called political parties’ strategies and goals is beside the point. It is fiddling while Rome burns.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s